Here I go, really over time I realized that the University of Chile is not how everyone believes it, the best university or one of excellence, not because of the teachers, on the contrary, it is what I rescue the most from the University, incredible teachers with knowledge of everything, very professional, with amazing resumes and very good people, but perhaps the managers and those who direct the course have been left behind.
As for my career, it requires a lot of terrain to be able to put into practice and understand the dynamics and theories, but under this understanding the university has not been so precise, we have had very few fields and very short, of just 1 day, While other universities and colleges have week-long plots and travel various parts, I am aware that this requires money but it must be done. In terms of infrastructure, the FAU was left behind, although the building has a historical and mystical weight, that is not a limitation to make a good and consistent infrastructure, we do not have geography rooms to do our studies, only one that remained small and all the rest of the faculty is for design and architecture. Regarding the curriculum and the duration of the degree this is very good, subjects appropriate to the context of the current geography and the duration cannot be shortened any more because it is a very intefral career and with a lot of knowledge of different areas. In general terms, the university has lagged behind in terms of teaching methods, particularly in terms of land, infrastructure, and therefore in technology and uses of technology.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario